Strategic Advisory
Periplus advises on matters where the decisive facts are local, relational, and unwritten. Through sector-specific networks, the firm establishes how a decision is likely to move, who holds real leverage, whether consent will hold, and how a counterparty will act when tested. This informs board and executive strategy, investment-committee decisions, transaction structuring, and case strategy in contentious matters, alongside the client’s own counsel and financial advisers.
Political & Regulatory Intelligence
Government intent and decision-making authority
Market entry and operating-environment assessment
Sovereign consent and regulatory sequencing
Contract durability and renegotiation risk
Factional balance and elite realignment
Community consent and social licence
Transaction & Counterparty Intelligence
Transaction viability and counterparty positioning
Enhanced due diligence on management integrity and beneficial ownership
Local partners, distributors, and the interests behind them
Execution risk and the approvals no chart shows
Supply-chain integrity and sustainability compliance
Post-close monitoring of assets, positions, and counterparties
Enforcement & Recovery Intelligence
Sovereign debt restructuring and the politics of settlement
Collectability assessment before acquisition, funding, or proceedings
Judgment execution and cross-border asset tracing
Arbitral award enforcement and commercial-capacity asset identification
Political protection, patronage, and traditional authority networks
Negotiation intelligence, witness credibility, and settlement leverage
Standing in-country interlocutors hold relationships in the markets where access is hardest to obtain. What is found is read against context and weighed against what is left unsaid—the distance between official register and private view—then tested against the arrangements that actually decide outcomes. Where matters are contentious, expert reports and testimony are available before ICSID, the LCIA, ICC, SCC, SIAC, HKIAC, and DIAC, and before the English and US courts.
A ministry granted the licence; a parallel understanding determined what it was worth.
Selected mandates, drawn from hundreds